DO AMERICAN "WAR NOIRS" TEND TOWARD "MELO"?

One of the theses that Dan Hodges (the indefatigable critic of classic film noir's deceptive "hard-boiled paradigm") has promulgated is that the American noirs made during World War II (particularly those made from 1940-43, before the war effort reached its peak of effectiveness and prospects for Allied victory began to significantly improve) were different in tone and character than those which began to appear in 1944-45 throughout the rest of the decade.

While virtually all noir scholars (including Dan) don't  accept the notion that film noir is not primarily an American phenomenon (Dan is more open to this fact than most, but has wanted to couch this as a function of the rise of "spy noir"), what becomes clear when we apply the analytic tools built into the Noir-o-Meter™is that American noir is significantly less "hard-boiled" in the years 1940-43.

Using the measurement tool we've been applying variously in recent posts--a scatterplot depiction of the degree that characters in noirs skew toward the "hardboiled," measured against the overall "MELO RATE" (using all three element types--character, visual, and plot/screenwriting)--we can see that what Dan used to call the "war noirs" (as discussed in his essay for Film Noir Reader 4) definitely skew to the "melo" side of the chart:

(Recall that films whose scores land in the upper left quadrant are more "hard-boiled," while those that land in the lower right quadrant are more "melo.")

The chart tells us that Dan was indeed onto something, especially when we compare it to the master chart that appeared several posts previously. "War noirs" are rarely "hard-boiled": as a group, they are noticeably different than the films which are made after WWII.

This chart does not include any of the spy noirs that Dan has uncovered in his most recent research. We'll include them in a subsequent presentation, which will deal more specifically with the relationship of "spy noir" to the overall notion of film noir, along with a parallel examination of a significant sub-category from France that Dan (and virtually all other students and scholars of film noir) overlook as they cling to an Anglo-American paradigm for how to define the "essence" of noir.

What is the name of that significant sub-category? According to scholar Colin Crisp, it's called the "provincial gothic." Its application will eventually be seen as pivotal to a more complete structural understanding of how the noir "virus" seeped into the bloodstream of melodrama and ran rampant, with various sub-categories and sub-types taking their turn in the limelight before a coarser, more calcified concept of noir's essence coalesced, coagulating critical appraisals of it almost from the dawn of the attempts to assemble and evaluate its history and significance.