HOW DO SPY NOIRS DIFFER FROM "STANDARD" FILM NOIR?

We specialize in loaded questions. But it's one that must be asked and answered, in order to fully demonstrate that the analytical approaches in the Noir-o-Meter™ align with the continuing research that Dan Hodges is conducting regarding a key aspect of film noir's evolution--the rise of the "spy noir."

Using the noir elements, it's possible to make general statements that go beyond Dan's purely narrative approach. (As we will see, the Noir-o-Meter might well help Dan do a more thorough job of discriminating between which spy films are "noir" and which are not--his decision to lump in any and all of the films that contain even a soupçon of noirish visuals might well explain some of the results that we will examined below.)

The charts below show the aggregate values of the noir elements (using the 26-element system as opposed to the still-in-development 27-element system with a reduced value for "flashbacks") for the entire classic noir database (films from US, UK, France, Italy, Germany, Spain, Scandinavia, Japan, Korea, Mexico and other South American countries). These are raw values--the second chart scales these to the 200-point system to show the range of intensity that these elements possess.

Alongside the overall data are the analogous data values for just over 70 "spy noirs" comprising a large percentage of the films identified in various sources and synthesized into a single group in Dan's research. The side-by-side comparison of these values will show the differences in emphasis and intensity that the Noir-o-Meter detects for "spy noirs" as distinct from the overall set of films in the database:

Note that elements which come from the "hard-boiled" components of noir are shown in blue, while those that come from the "melodrama" understructure are shown in green. The DIFF column is based on a scale where 100 means that the intensity value is exactly equal between noirs as a whole and "spy noirs."

As you can see, the "spy noirs" are, as a group, around 20% less intense than the overall population of films noirs. All elements where "spy noirs" are at least 15% less intense have had the raw "spy noir" values and the DIFF measure put into bold type for ease of reference. 13 of the elements--half of the entire element grouping--are at least 15% less intense. Only three elements--violence relative to character development/interaction; exotic/remote/barren location setting; and a betrayal/double-cross--are more intensely present in "spy noirs" than in noirs as a whole.

Examining these differences by element types is instructive. Given that "spy noirs" have a more rigorously formulaic approach to establishing character, it's not surprising that the intensity of noir attributes as possessed by characters in "spy noirs" is significantly lower. By contrast, there is much less of a difference in the visual elements.

But note that plot/screenwriting elements show the greatest dip in intensity. This is because so many of the early "spy noirs" do not partake of any of the narrative strategies that first developed in melodrama in the late 30s and early 40s (a trend that is traced in David Bordwell's recent book REINVENTING HOLLYWOOD). Later on, these techniques began to be applied to spy noirs as well, but they were "late to the party" in terms of this narrative innovation (and this is reflected in the numbers).

The hard-boiled/melodrama "balance in tension" within film noir is what the Noir-o-Meter succeeds in quantifying for us, and we can see how this relationship differs in "spy noirs" as compared to noir as a whole. The intensity of both element clusters is lower in "spy noirs," but the greatest drop is on the "hard-boiled" side. As a result, "spy noirs" trend toward the "melodrama" understructure by roughly another 10%, focusing more on actions and visuals than on flamboyant manifestations of character. When the "ruthless" character is part of an assumed worldview as manifested in the the "spy noir's" dramatic context, the actions of those characters are less outside the norms of behavior than what we customarily see in film noir as a whole. Hence the "hard-boiled" portrayal of character is diminished.

Thus the hard-boiled to melodrama character element ratio is lower as well, though it is not as pronounced (down to 84 from 89).

Now let's look at the same data expressed in the 200-point system of the Noir-o-Meter. We've color-coded for levels of intensity:

We highlight in bold type the elements which have the greatest drop in intensity in the spy noirs--and, per the discussion above, you can see that it's the elements in the "character" and "plot/screenwriting" element types that have all of these.

The "decriminalization" of the "spy noir" is most evident in the difference seen in the noir element entitled "story told from the perspective of the criminals." Though spies in "spy noirs" often commit acts that in other contexts would be considered criminal in nature, they are seldom treated that way within these films. The suspension of moral rules within this narrative sub-universe gives them a "pass" in this area, even though we don't see characters in spy noirs as any more "morally ambiguous" than the garden-variety noir character.

All in all, "spy noirs" are definitely noir as seen by the Noir-o-Meter, though they are much closer to the 100-point dividing line. This is largely due to the fact that the early "spy noirs" grade lower in many of the elements measured here--the average Noir-o-Meter™raw score for "spy noirs" made up until America's entry into WWII is just over 90. That average rises to 109 for those films made in 1942 and beyond.